This actually allowed them to lean further into the funk zone with their style to complement photography instead of compete with it. It pushed them over the edge into accepting photography as the best medium for capturing life’s fleeting moments. This movement of AI taking over reminds me of painters’ reacting to the advent of photography back in the 1820s the majority of them were outraged, but it also had a hefty influence on impressionist painters. That being said, resistance to new innovations in artistry is nothing new.
As of right now, there’s still not a definitive yes or no as to whether these generative AI programs are on the right or wrong side of the law-though we do at least know that AI-generated images can not be copyrighted. Things are obviously very complicated right now and the matter is actively being investigated by the United States Office of Copyright. The key issue here is generative AI that can replicate artists’ styles-which is already possible using a program called Midjourney. It’s important to note that AI isn’t simply copying and pasting other artists’ work into one giant mashup. Are they flat-out stealing it? Not really. Are they trained using art made by humans? Yes. It doesn’t take a lot of research to realize all of these programs understand art through machine learning: algorithms that are merely recognizing patterns and well… not much else. Along with those factors I also fed each with identical prompts to see how they rendered four different scenes.īefore we start, I’d be remiss not to discuss claims that AI Image Generators are “stealing” other artists’ work. My comparison analyzed cost, ease of use, image resolution, dynamic range, composition, creativity, post-processing, and even speed. Prompt: Darth vader as an EDM DJ in front of a massive crowd, cyberpunk vibes, hyperrealistic, dynamic lighting, reflections - ar 4: 5 Matt Crisara via Midjourney
0 kommentar(er)
